Popular Science News $section News
  Get Popular Science posters here! > Subscribe | > Newsletter 

Home
PPX
What's New
How2.0
Photo Gallery
Blog
Science
Aviation & Space
Automotive Tech
Technology
Environment
Contact Us
Subscribe
Digital Edition
Customer Service
Gift Subscription
Current Issue
Media Kit
PS Showcase
PopSci Store
RSS

Enter e-mail address to receive popsci weekly updates to your inbox.



ad

« Motorola's New Tech Debutante Ball | Main | The Future of the Music Business is Now »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca35253ef00e54f0947a98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are We Being Watched by Flying Robot Insects?:

Comments

Bill

Learn to use spell check. This could be real. The true state of technology is around ten generations farther along then what is publicly acknowledged. Technological advancement does not rise at a constant rate. Computer chips are advancing faster then software can be written to utilize them.
(quad core, 128 bit)

guru

if the true state of technology is 10 generations ahead, how can measure a generation? i'm interested in what the 7th and 8th generations would currently look like. and also, do you know how many generations till we have a good shrinking machine?

ket

so this is the next big thing, i mean robot, rule the world

coldpudding

I'll need to get my electric fly spray

Nico

This Technology really is helpful in some cases but not all the time. There will be a time that man just like in some fantasy films would say that "there are many spies out there it could be anything, birds, trees, rocks, even insects."

Nathan

If they can dream up all the conspiracies involving Iraq and that Bush was behind 9/11, I can certainly see how they can dream up flying insect bots that spy on them. and I have to live among these people?

steve comins

the author said "Thankfully, said program is many, many years from realization" WHY! Do yo not want your gov. to have a tool to fight islamo-facist?

Captain BrickBat

None of those protestors probably ever considered the fact that it's been getting warmer out. Warmer, humid summers and springs make mean more bugs! Also who needs really exspensive robo spy bugs flying around when you can watch them on a...camera. Good ol' security camera or video camera. You might of heard of those before, you can buy them anywhere. Better video image quality and sound. On a microchip bugbot you're going to get really grainy video and sound at best. Better for spying on foreign nations and military threats where you can stand out in the open with a simple camera.

nate4freedom

This is real....there is an article in a the sept. 29 issue of "The Economist" called 'learning to live w/ big brother'where a british journalist reports on how gov's. spies on us and he mentioned this exact surveilence system being deployed upon peaceful demonstrators/protestors, among others. coincidence? look it up.

White

Meow!

rguru

Remember the scene in a Get Smart episode about this over 40 years ago? The Chief had just finished viewing a demonstration of CONTROL's delicate, microphone-equipped, prototype spy robot fly that cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop... then Maxwell comes in to talk to Chief about another matter, sees the "fly" sitting on the desk, and immediately "kills" it with a rolled-up paper!

(Double Agent, Airdate: Saturday, January 8, 1965, 8:30 PM)

Paul T

Technological advancement isn't bad intrinsically, it's the use of that technology that can be qualified as "good" or "bad". And considering the accelerated progress in technology and science, it's not a question of "if" but "when" (be it, one, seven or ten generations). One hundred years ago, some people must have wondered about the possible applications of telecommunications, flying machines or atomic energy, in the same way that now the author questions the use of this "future" technology; So, I believe we should be asking our selfs what to do, in order for those new creations, to be used in a "good" way, and prevent them, from being used to harm humanity, or even, the rest of the world, for that matter.

Jerry

Learn to use spell check, then proof read.

irony police

Um... Jerry, not to be a stickler, but don't you mean "proofread"?

Motto for a longer life:
Don't sweat the small stuff...
and it's all small stuff.

mike

I totally think this possible. Also, if the insects don't work out. Try attaching a phone with videoing capabilities to a remote control helicopter. If our science is so far ahead why haven't the invisibility cloak come onto to the market already. How many of you bloggers are in North Carolina? If so what county do you live in? I'm 15 and live in Wake County. Dude, try proofreading your stuff.

kemal

everybody need some paronoid items. News are good but dangerous. Who can use this kind of rob for daily purpose.

bard2.0

To bee or not to bee?

That is the national security question.

Joseph A Nickence

The Feds know all they want to know about you. It's called Social Security. Where do you think all the money goes? Certainly not into retirement funds.

I'd be more concerned about Big Business, rather than Big Brother. Ever wonder how much Wal Mart knows about you?

mike

Karen, I think that information reliable so go for it, but if your gut feeling is that this is not good don't go for it. Better safe than sorry.

halo pwns

hi

halo pwns

ok that was a test run, but want to now, why do they want a flying robot when they have all the information in encryped files in their computers? just asking.

Lynton

Invent a spy object that every body will try to kill if seen, idiots spend millioms on this?

David Kuehn

The government, i.e. the MILITARY is light years
ahead of any public knowledge....remember all the misinformation surrounding the Stealth Bomber? Blue-green laser can probably analyze your DNA from outer space by now, and who knows what else our tax dollars are funding. Classified files are numerous; facts involve "plausable denial".

Liz

I wonder if the Mahoney who wrote this is the same one I know... :)
Anyway, I've been waiting for these little bots to come around into official surveillance use for a few years. Larger "species" have been test piloted in the last two years and I'm inclined to believe that the newest models are much, much smaller, and composed of very different materials. I wonder just how small can they get, and how much microprocessing power can be squeezed onto one? What about communication? Do they have video and audio? I think that would impress me most. I mean, they can't have a lot of memory aboard, so it makes sense that they would need to communicate with a ground base to relay information.
Really though...how small are they capable of making them at this point? Still big enough to be noticeable to the naked eye, right? Right?

veiviouctot

im reasoning of applying for an online payday allowance but theres so profuse place's which is the most appropriate locale to get a credit i dont wanna get ripped off!! any suggestions? divert add links
hold responsible you :)
http://marialbigblog.info

The comments to this entry are closed.

spacer
Return to the Blog Index


January 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31



Customer Service
Copyright © 2005 Popular Science
A Time4 Media Company All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Index