Popular Science News $section News
  Get Popular Science posters here! > Subscribe | > Newsletter 

Home
PPX
What's New
How2.0
Photo Gallery
Blog
Science
Aviation & Space
Automotive Tech
Technology
Environment
Contact Us
Subscribe
Digital Edition
Customer Service
Gift Subscription
Current Issue
Media Kit
PS Showcase
PopSci Store
RSS

Enter e-mail address to receive popsci weekly updates to your inbox.



ad

« One of Our Brilliant 10 is Now Officially a Genius | Main | Sukhoi Unveils First Russian Passenger Jet Since the Fall of the USSR »

Comments

Hector

Is this the scene where he used the sidewalk curb to help get him up there? If it is, then you're over-simplifying the problem. He doesn't generate all of the force with his legs, he uses the motorcycle's power to do most of it. He bumps the front wheel up in the air using the curb, and then releases a burst of power from the rear wheel, using the curb to help re-direct the thrust vertically. Watch "trials" bike competitions and you'll see similar feats performed many times throughout every ride.

Mike

I've seen the film twice and not only does the bike launch off the curb as Hector states, but you can also clearly see that the section of the curb that Bourne hits has been shaped like a ramp. There was certainly no CG involved.

Adam Weiner

You guys may be right. Normally when I review movie physics I do it off of the DVD with plenty of opportunity to replay scenes and review the details. I didn't remember seeing a ramp when I watched the scene in the theater, but from what you say apparantly there was. If so then clearly the jump could be possible. In that case apply the physical analysis to the sublimely ridiculous jumps in "XXX" for contrast.

Jake P

good work on the physics...im enjoying my course in it this year...

joeschmoe

do a math analysis of bourne movie 1 where he uses the fat guy to cushion his fall and fall 3-4 flights onto hard marble, and survives without a broken bone.....would he survive without breaking bones in reality?

mike d.

Is that movie any good? If so on a 1-10 scale where would it stand (1 being the worst and 10 being the best movie you have ever seen).

Priya

this movie is definetly a 10. but you HAVE TO watch the first two before you see this one. the whole story is just incredible.

Adam Weiner

Joe-I haven't seen the first movie yet, but the short answer to your question on whether Bourne can have his fall broken by "the fat guy" without being hurt is - extremely unlikely! What breaks bones and causes injury due to impacts or other sudden motions is the magnitude of force applied in changing your velocity - in this case slowing you to a stop. The less time it takes for a given change in velocity the greater your acceleration, and therefore the the greater the force that has to act on you. (F= ma) Impact times during collisions with hard objects are generally very short, generally a few hundredths of a second. Falling into a pad like a pole vaulter greatly increases the time it takes to come to a stop, and therefore reduces the force proportionally. However using a person as a pad, even a "hefty" one, will not likely reduce the acceleration time all that much. Even a very padded body is not as soft as you might think. The likelyhood of just surviving is low, not to mention walking away without a serious injury.

ssalty48

Normally I don't watch many spy movies made after Goldfinger, but I did see the Bourne Identity. I only saw the first movie. On Pay Per View. I'd rate it a 5 (one which I'll probably rent or buy on PPV one day, as long as I see the second one first...or actually second). Anyway: I got a D in Physics -- but at least I passed. Still, I realize the calculations were only about 'vertical' acceleration, but what about horizontal acceleration? And, that said, how thick were the soles of his spy shoes to stand even the nanosecond it took to help launch him?

peterwjj

i disagree with your conclusion that bourne needed 2 tons of leg push to hop his cycle over a six foot wall. rear tire compression, when lifting the front of the bike with a yank back and balance of body weight shift, causes the rear tire to flatten out then spring back to normal shape. the spring back is timed with the leg push in order to maximize lift and the spinning rear tire also impacts the wall on the way up providing additional lift at the sacrifice of some forward momentum but if timed right and body weight is thrown forward

Peter G.

Yeah, this was sloppy. Advanced trials-bike riders can do stuff like that routinely. Bourne wasn't on a trials bike, but the curb was slightly rigged, so there's no reason to doubt it's possible.

You can see more of this sort of thing here, a YouTube video I found by searching for "trials". A few similar vertical-wall attacks can be found around 45 seconds in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zPNQAZMVOA

Also, you're completely wrong to say "Not even the winner of the World's Strongest Man contest has muscles capable of exerting a force of almost a ton." In fact, the World's Strongest Man competition often involves such forces. I can leg-press a ton myself, though only for short extensions. (Famously, even Pat Robertson has made the same claim. :-) A professional weight lifter can exceed a ton even for a full-extension leg press.

Now, would anyone be able to apply a ton of force over an 0.2-second interval? That's probably impossible just on the basis that it would have to take place over a distance of several feet, and nobody's legs are that long.

. png

Ray Best

If you want to see a phenominal display of physics in action, go to a world round observed trials competition.Top ranked riders routinely climb 8 foot vertical walls, and many more jaw dropping feats.

Trials pro

The tires were Michellin X11 trials tires. Best sticky traction tires used by trials riders worldwide. I can vault and climb, and I'm just an average skills rider. No real science breakdown here, just a stuntman with trials skills. I can even bunny hop over a fat man.

Bob "Motorcycle Lift" James

Great post! I especially found it interesting when you began discussing the physics of the movie. The movie has awesome special effects, with little reality, thats hollywood for ya.

Retro Jordan

Excellent post. It makes me realize the energy of words and pictures. I learn a lot, thank you! Wish you make a further progress in the future.

Creative Recreation

I only lately started out leaving comments! Makes me imagine a tiny extra about what I enjoyed and learned concerning the article! Fantastic recommendations, thanks!Welcome to visit my web http://www.sneakers4sales.com

bell

Well now, I was searching for blogs on fitness or health when i came across this post. Although not exactly what I was expecting I will give it ****.

Wholesale Suppliers


Jason Charles Bourne, born David Webb, is a fictional character in the novels of Robert Ludlum and subsequent film adaptations. He first appeared in the novel The Bourne Identity (1980). This novel was first adapted for television in 1988, and then adapted to the film, which is very loosely based on the novels, in 2002 under a title of the same name.
The Bourne Identity (2002)
The Bourne Supremacy (2004).
The Bourne Ultimatum (20007)
These American Spy movies are directed by Paul Greengrass
The fourth movie, The Bourne Legacy, is scheduled for release in July 2012.

The comments to this entry are closed.

spacer
Return to the Blog Index


January 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31



Customer Service
Copyright © 2005 Popular Science
A Time4 Media Company All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Index